Smallest Away Support
#81
Posted 18 September 2006 - 10:30 PM
#82
Posted 08 October 2006 - 06:14 PM
#83
Posted 09 October 2006 - 10:17 AM
#84
Posted 09 October 2006 - 10:19 AM
#85
Posted 09 October 2006 - 01:23 PM
It shocked you?
Why on earth were you shocked by it?
No, I just like the word.
#86
Posted 09 October 2006 - 03:19 PM
Lowest I've seen is Wigan in the FA Cup less than 140. Shocking..
Wrong, 250. If you're going to take the p*ss, at least get the facts right.
#87
Posted 09 October 2006 - 06:07 PM
Dole doesnt stretch that far
#88
Posted 09 October 2006 - 06:25 PM
Wrong, 250. If you're going to take the p*ss, at least get the facts right.
Nope deffo under 200. Doesnt matter anyway whether it was 140 or 250. God damn terrible.
#89
Posted 09 October 2006 - 06:31 PM
#90
Posted 09 October 2006 - 06:58 PM
Lowest I've seen is Wigan in the FA Cup less than 140. Shocking..
What do you expect when it was a replay, on tv, midweek, expensive and they wernt even going to play a full strength squad and they had huge games coming up in a couple weeks time.
#91
Posted 09 October 2006 - 07:08 PM
What do you expect when it was a replay, on tv, midweek, expensive and they wernt even going to play a full strength squad and they had huge games coming up in a couple weeks time.
Why is that what deters you from going to games because its a replay and 'huge' game coming up, Pretty poor excuse? For a Premier League club its terrible never mind league two.
#92
Posted 09 October 2006 - 07:47 PM
Why is that what deters you from going to games because its a replay and 'huge' game coming up, Pretty poor excuse? For a Premier League club its terrible never mind league two.
Because people ar'nt made of money. im not saying your wrong about it, because its a shocking away support, and they were shocking at ewood to, but im just thinking of reasons for why their support was so bad. But when big games are coming up and it was on tv anyway (which was probably the biggest reason) and it was midweek,(they were more important factors to why their support was so bad) they aint going to be supporting their club in their thousands.
#93
Posted 09 October 2006 - 08:04 PM
attendance 30,498
Newcastle support -30,497
Ventspils support -1 .....and a huge flag.
#94
Posted 11 October 2006 - 04:28 PM
Why is that what deters you from going to games because its a replay and 'huge' game coming up, Pretty poor excuse? For a Premier League club its terrible never mind league two.
A newly promoted Premier League club, whose best ever average crowd before last season, was 11,000? We dont have the support numbers to take thousands everywhere. We had loads of games that month, and if there was one everyone was going to skip, it was this one. As for whether we had 200 or less, our programme gives our away attendance as 262, and thats what Ill choose to believe
Wigan's fixtures in January 2006:
Birmingham Away (1,812 Wigan fans) Premier League
Leeds Home (10,980, 3,476 of which were Leeds fans) FA Cup 3rd Round
Arsenal Home (12,181, 1,562 Arsenal fans) League Cup Semi Final 1st Leg (on TV)
West Brom Home (17,421, 2,782 West Brom fans) Premier League (on TV)
Leeds Away (15,243, 262 Wigan fans) FA Cup 3rd Round Replay (on TV)
Middlesbrough Away (27,208, 1,065 Wigan fans) Premier League
Arsenal Away (34,692, 1,579 Wigan fans) League Cup Semi Final 2nd Leg (on TV)
Man City Away (30,811, 2,842 Wigan fans) FA Cup 4th Round
Everton Home (21,731, 5,266 Everton fans) Premier League
Im sick of talking about our attendance at this game, it was crap, we know. It certainly wasnt unexpected though. These are the games Wigan played in January, and in comparison to the other 8 games, Leeds away was pretty insignificant. We had barely 7,000 fans in the first game, did you really expect hordes of Wiganers to descend upon Elland Road?
#95
Posted 11 October 2006 - 04:31 PM
#96
Posted 13 October 2006 - 08:42 PM
The lowest i've ever witnessed was 3.
That was brought by Leigh RMI in a League game on a saturday.
Jesus, that is awful.
At Kettering, we had 5 Yaxley fans in the FA Cup Qualifying Rounds the other week.
Yaxley are like 84 places below us, and we are in the conference north!
#97
Posted 06 November 2006 - 09:16 AM
Edited by JamesBFC, 06 November 2006 - 09:17 AM.
#98
Posted 10 December 2006 - 05:38 PM
Boston equalled the lowest we've had in the Football League last Tuesday with 99.
I can't think of many teams that will do worse than that this season, although Macclesfield are in with a good chance again, even if it is on a Saturday.
Bury took 94 to barnet last season.
#99
Posted 10 December 2006 - 06:00 PM
Bury took 94 to barnet last season.
179.
Edited by JamesBFC, 10 December 2006 - 06:01 PM.
#100
Posted 10 December 2006 - 06:03 PM
179.
I have a bury supporting mate and he said it was 94 and he was one of them.
#101
Posted 11 December 2006 - 08:31 PM
#102
Posted 11 December 2006 - 08:34 PM
I have a bury supporting mate and he said it was 94 and he was one of them.
We are poor but not that poor mate
#103
Posted 11 December 2006 - 08:35 PM
#104
Posted 23 December 2006 - 09:45 AM
#105
Posted 23 December 2006 - 10:32 AM
not when they play chelsea,we take the place overFulham's away support is ****ing awful.
#106
Posted 23 December 2006 - 12:43 PM
#107
Posted 23 December 2006 - 06:00 PM
#108
Posted 23 December 2006 - 06:41 PM
Chester brought 44 his year in the LDV, think thats about th smallest ive seen for a competitive match.
Where did you hear 44? it looked like there was more than that imo.
#109
Posted 23 December 2006 - 08:07 PM
#110
Posted 23 December 2006 - 08:21 PM
#111
Posted 23 December 2006 - 10:54 PM
#112
Posted 23 December 2006 - 10:58 PM
According to the radio, Charlton had about 50 odd up at Boro today. That must be an all time Premier League low?
The actual Charlton figure was 197.
#113
Posted 26 December 2006 - 02:25 AM
The actual Charlton figure was 197.
Fulham brought less than that this season.
#114
Posted 26 December 2006 - 11:21 AM
#115
Posted 27 December 2006 - 11:28 PM
What was the Fulham figure mate? i heard it was low.
Less than 150, about 130. dont know exactly though.
For a 3pm saturday match, thats really poor.
Edited by jordnrovers4eva, 27 December 2006 - 11:29 PM.
#116
Posted 13 January 2007 - 12:23 AM
#117
Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:06 AM
#118
Posted 20 January 2007 - 10:18 PM
#119
Posted 21 January 2007 - 07:31 PM
#120
Posted 21 January 2007 - 07:56 PM
The two times I've seen Cheltenham play Scunthorpe, Scunthorpe seemed to have surprisingly little fans, although that was probs cos it was a midweek game each time. But when they played in the FA Cup, when the announcer did the whole "Number 25 Billy Sharp!" line ups thing, whenever a players name was mentioned, I didn't hear a single cheer, and usually you hear at least a slight "Yeahhhh" coming from the away end.
There's a good reason why we only took 160 fans last week (160, probably more than what others have taken there this season) The game was re-arranged from 10 days previous, giving very little time for people to be able to get the cash together/get the day off work.
If it was played on the Saturday as planned, there would've been 3-400 IMO.
BUt your views on football/life are... "interesting" to say the least, so I'll take what you say with a very large pinch of salt.
Oh, and I still remember that you tipped us for relegation at the start of the season
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










