Hahaha I'm messing with you mate, I was hoping you'd see the sarcasm in my tone.
It was a common joke on here 3 years ago to say Lima was in altitude :lol:
I'm watching South Korea against Honduras right now, and they are looking clueless against a side that decided to bunker down. Sweden tend to do that a lot as far as I'm aware, so I can see a draw or a narrow Sweden win.
I hope Lee Seung Woo plays. He's a talent.
Despite believing we are better than Denmark, we are still underdogs in this, which is a good thing as we thrive in those conditions.
Assuming no one gets injured, I think we will lineup like this
Gallese
Advincula - Rodriguez - Ramos - Trauco
Tapia - Yotun
Carrillo - Cueva - Flores
Farfan...
This whole Paolo Guerrero issue has become a soap opera. I can get his frustration but some of the claims he is making isn't going to help himself.
He's not going, I wish he can just accept it. We have won games without him anyways, so I'm not concerned.
1. Only an idiot would claim Nigeria to be a more traditional football nation than Uruguay, who have more semi-final appearances than any African nation in their history.
2. Paraguay aren't world class, but they are a good side albeit not excellent. My point was that they always produce quality...
And on Paraguay... 8 World Cup qualifications in by far the hardest qualification zone and 1 quarter final. 2 Copa Americas with less resources than anyone else in the continent. As I said, being good at football is the most important factor.
You're an idiot. Teams don't always perform in tournaments, it doesn't always speak for their level. Uruguay is, have and always will be a better team than Nigeria.
And don't even bring me the excuse that its a "poor country with little infrastructure". Paraguay is one of the poorest countries in the world also with few people, and they always churn out good players.