Search results

You just post the same thing over and over again. Why won't your criticise Gerrard for making demonstrably false remarks? Do you think what he is saying is true, or do you think he is beyond criticism, Which is it?

Good to see you haven't dealt with the point at all. Nor do you realise that stating an "anti Catholic conspiracy" would be stating something demonstrably false (it was used alongside the Earth is flat). I can help but find it utterly astonishing you don't realise this. Next up - Leo defends...

Yes, I know exactly what I did by saying Rangers were the victim of an anti Catholic conspiracy. It's the kind of nonsense I could easily see Gerrard coming out with. Bottom line, most fans recognise when their manager is speaking nonsense (they are all guilty of it to varying degrees) except...

Why would he believe it, though? Is he claiming he has watched Rangers for several seasons before joining? Does he believe it because someone else told him, and he repeated it verbatim? It's obviously number 2. Of course, no matter how much you respect or admire anyone, you can still call...

Er, refereeing mistakes happen at every level of football - how many managers state it is a conspiracy against their team? But, anyway, unsurprisingly, this post makes no mention or acknowledgement about how Steven Gerrard has clearly and blatantly lied about forming this opinion over a number...

I do remember Rangers got awarded a penalty when it should have been given offside. He didn't mention that. Astonishing the red card was rescinded, really inconsistent behaviour from the SFA. Managers, or players, criticising referees should be viewed with contempt regardless of whether they...

Gerrard managed a full heads gone moment just after his first game, despite it actually being a decent result. An absolutely ludicrous interview, goading over another team in a game he didn't win. You do wonder what will happen when he loses. Who will he blame? Referee anti Rangers conspiracy...

Yeah but why would you take out the two biggest teams in the league? Aberdeen are all but guaranteed 4 fixtures against each, each season. These games are routinely televised. Players playing in League One won't ever get to play in equivalent stadiums (unless a cup tie) and will get far less...

So it's two players? Turnover only tells part of the story, players will be attracted by more than just money. Aberdeen gives you exposure to top level football, playing in much larger stadiums as well as European ties almost every season. Players have more chance of meaningful silverware -...

So your example is one player?

Did every nation take their strongest squad? I'd be interested to hear the facts about those "making a stir". And indeed who the "shit-munchers" are.

Strange post. What is the intent of it?

You don't understand how this works at all, do you? Tell us about these league one standard players. However, the fact that a FA cup shock would come up was absolutely inevitable.

Before the Aberdeen game the Scottish news was interviewing Burnley fans bragging about how easy it would be and that Aberdeen was a League One Standard team. Astonishing the ignorance and arrogance that prevails in the English game. Also interesting to see Rangers have been renamed to...

And England went out to Norway, it seems.

The strength in depth in French football is unbelievable. They look miles ahead. Wouldn't Mbappe qualify for this tournament as well? Scary.

Remember when some England fans were insisting Pickford was better than Alisson? You should - it was only last week. I wonder if this transfer would have happened had Karius not made two mistakes in the CL final. Would have been viewed as quite harsh had he had a decent or not memorable game...

It's truly amazing what people will believe. I would oppose the bid regardless of who is involved, the World Cup should be looking to go into nations where domestic football can be grown. The UK is already at saturation point, it would have no effect. Put it somewhere like China or India instead.

I don't think that is the case at all, a lot of people have taken issue with the ridiculous notion that it was all an inside ironic joke. The Scotland results were provided for context, as expressed, 7 of the players from the game were the same so it isn't a drastically different side. They...

Except there was articles across the whole spectrum of the English media - from the red tops to the Guardian, the Economist and the Financial Times. This narrative that it is all a bit of an inside joke and that nobody really thought England won is a Trumpian level of self delusion. Yes, loads...