Bony has done predictable bad for city, as benteke has for liverpool, as vardy would for another club. these players suit different types of football better than others. and they have the team built around them, they are their talismans, or were
well no wonder some liverpool fans said that after beating a team you probably just sweated like a pig over beating, in a much more convincing way. proving how much of football is down to tactics and belief
a goal back that's the least they deserved, I like the side with most possession to win the game, like I like the side who make the most metres in rugby to win the game
man city like tottenham are over confident in their attacking capabilities (I mean no disrespect to any spurs or city fans, liverpool even do sometimes), they have good keepers, in Lloris and Hart, so they normally get away with over committing though
I can't believe how much the PL is favouring teams who defend more than attack. defence (and staying solid is paying off) seems to be the best form of attack. Prior to the match I said arsenal don't have enough in attack (or shouldn't do) to win the league, but now I've just realized, neither do...
Can they win? yes, delighted for them but it makes a mockery of the PL. It's also worth noting, that despite other clubs spending all that money, they can't put together the most basic formation in football with a good a team as leicester city.
Will they win? yes, but you'd still put city...
he got involved at half time, in the team talk, told them what they were doing wrong, and we were the better team in the 2nd half believe it or not (I know everyone anti liverpool fan and watford fan are on cloud 9 so don't want to believe that) (as he said) despite not getting anything to show...
it's ok you don't understand but I'll try to explain as well as possible: klopp could of easily chosen a formation that would have been more compact, in klopp's post match he talks about compactness of our formation letting us down