Search results

You two are cute. I've missed you.

I don't blame them for it. They realized they were going backwards after a horrible season and decided to flex their financial muscle and attract some big names, The opposite is what we did after our first bad season under Benitez, and look how that turned out.

Some films i've seen recently: Terminator Genisys: A very bad mashup of the first two films, and not a good one. Some scenes were entertaining and i loved old Arnold in the role, but not even Emilia Clarke could save it. I give it a 5.5/10 Monsters: Expected it to be better but it's a...

Fantastic Four is out in a couple of weeks...anyone excited for that?

One more thing we aren't really focusing on; we have just strengthened an opponent. In my mind we are looking to break into the top 4, and looking at how they've struggled to improve their team this season and with Kompany/Toure dropping a few levels City were the most likely to drop out of the...

Don't think he's a good passer to be honest. He's at his best when he's running at the opposition, and he can beat a man. I think only Hazard had more successful dribbles last season in England (and there aren't many in Europe that dribble better than Hazard, if any). Sterling is also quite...

This, it's inexplicable. I understand that it was difficult to handle Nadal's ridiculous spin on his forehand, but a common factor when Federer loses is his backhand breaking down. Whether it's against Djokovic or Seppi. I would feel slightly bad for him but it's been like that for a decade...

I always think it's Federer's inability to properly attack a second serve that stopped him from winning more slams. He's a great returner but unless he's running around the forehand on second serves, he usually just chips it back with his backhand and let the other guy back in. He gets away...

There was an air of inevitability about this all along, but a great effort from Djokovic nonetheless. He bores me, but i really admire his ability to dig in and bring out his best tennis when it matters the most. For Federer, it's another lost chance to further emphasize his status as the...

I've seen this too many times before, it's like Federer vs Nadal all over again. Djokovic will win this, i have no doubt about it.

I'd be ok with bidding for Bolasie, purely because we probably won't lose to Palace.

It's a great deal for us if true, but we'll most probably ruin it with poor transfers. I admit this has turned me slightly bitter towards Sterling, and a part of me wishes to see him fail, not because he wanted to move to a better club, that's understandable, but because he thinks he is much...

Always find it odd when people talk about sportsmen's personalities. Don't think you can judge any of them by their on court behavior when emotions are high or even their interviews. Anywya, head says Djokovic in 5 again, heart says Fed in 4.

I also think Federer will beat Djokovic if he serves like that on Sunday, but it definitely won't be over 3 sets. Murray didn't do much wrong today but i really don't see Novak making the same mistakes. He is much stronger mentally and has got the better of Federer in their last few grand slam...

That was absolutely phenomenal from Federer. Some of the best tennis i've seen him play, at 34!!!

Federer has never lost a semi final at Wimbledon, that's some stat. Really difficult to predict who will come out on top for that one. Djokovic will destroy Gasquet.

If Higuain doesn't squander those chances in the final last year & last night, Messi would be the best of all time. Since Higuain missed, then Messi has failed at international level. Football fans can be strange.

Yeah fair point, didn't take much to look better than these Argies.

Chile were great, Argentina bloody awful, Martino is a horrible manager and Higuain is the biggest big game bottler i have ever seen. Also, who the hell subs Aguero for Higuain and lets him take a penalty? Christ:bl:

It's brilliant. Statham is a comedic genius:2thumb: Saw Jurassic World last week. It's pointless, has no reason to exist (but $$).