Search results

Because I've commented on Chelsea title chances doesn't make me a Chelsea fan. I've also suggested that Man City will win the title but do not support them either.

Agreed. A decent squad and a manager who after some tinkering has found how to get the best out of the players in his disposal. In Costa and Hazard they have match winners.

Don't be fooled by their comments on here, most Liverpool fans believe it is their year. Now when have we heard that before...

Best player of the millennium because he won trophies domestically whilst playing in two of europes inferior leagues? And let's recall a common theme that was made about zlatan when playing in the big games of champions league. He was always a player that was criticised for going missing.

Why would peps city be an unpopular winner? They certainly are playing attractive football. And certainly more popular than their midtable rivals and some London clubs. To some extent they would be more popular than Liverpool, unlikely as they may be as champions.

Abit of an understatement. The local women's over 60 pub team could show Jose and Utd how to play proper football.

Man City played well during that half. But when the opposition has world class players, they will need few chances to score. City can still win this but you would have to fear their defence may play the biggest role in the second half.

Champions league...Man City v Barca. Plenty of quality in both teams. The best team in Spain against the best in the premier league. A must win for City?

Certainly a thought provoking response there from smat. But the topic is about zlatans ability or lack thereof.

Liverpool fans should be allowed their moment of excitement. It normally all changes come the new year.

His reputation is based on him performing predominantly in the French league. That is a poor league in terms of quality. The fact that ballotelli is scoring on the same rate as zlatan was speaks volumes. Utd signed him even though he would not even make anyone's top 10 list of best striker in...

I was talking about 2005.

United can only hope to reach 6th at best. Pogba is turning out to be an expensive flop, Jose no longer trusts Mkhtaryian, Zlatan was never as good as he thought and in any event is way past his best. Spurs are struggling and will suffer without Kane. The combination of Europe and lack of...

On that basis Liverpool fluked their last major trophy in 2005?

He is mediocre at best. If he was decent, in the modern squad game he would have got sufficient games. Klopp could clearly see that.

Yes please do.

It appears he was signed as Jose wanted a friend at his new club. And also help him obtain his last huge contract.

Or is he someone whose talent never matched his ego? After his lack of ability led to his exit at Barcelona, he enjoyed some success in two of the lower leagues in Europe. At a reported £300k a week, will this 35 year old turn out to be an expensive flop for midtable utd? Discuss

The point which seems to have flown over most ppls head is that it's not the platform they perform at which equates to their ability.

Now let's follow your line of "logic" if we can call it that. There are many players who have performed on CL level. Look at the Liverpool team of 2005. Are you suggesting they were world class? I would recommend you listen to those whose knowledge is greater than yours rather than try and...