Search results

I wouldn't say Fleetwood deserve to be ahead but we've not done enough, that's for sure. Seems to be some sort of 4-1-4-1 going on but there's not enough (any?) threat down the left so everything is having to go through Jones.

Makes sense, but I hope that number would be pretty high as I think losing Crowley would be a massive blow for any hopes of promotion this season.

I'm afraid you might be waiting a while on that one - we play tomorrow.

We've got a really nice new pitch

If we accept I'll have to assume it's silly money for my own sanity. Him and Nemane were excellent together going forwards so it would make a lot of sense. In American sports you can often get a lot of benefit by dealing with new owners who want to make marquee signings/trades, so I could also...

Aaaaand there it is

We have looked good for saying we're playing 3(?) of our best eleven, although on this showing Grant and McGoldrick are putting serious cases forward to start. Shrewsbury look absolutely awful though.

Sunday at 1pm, toilet. Definitely a positive start on Saturday, hopefully get some bodies in or back for this but I think we'll be work in progress for this month.

That feels like a slightly harsh assessment but I suppose 8 goals and 3 assists in a team that scored 85 goals or whatever it was isn't an incredible output. I do think that the threat of his pace is valuable in itself as it gives others more space and for a team like MK who will probably have...

Really interested to know what the "substantial" fee was, but disappointing to lose someone who was such a useful player. Not perfect by any means and it sounds like Grant solves a different issue in the squad so I can see why they've done it. Maynard said in his presser we were after two more...

Never heard of it

New club, new season, but some things never change.

Yeah I think this is fair enough. There seems to be a lot of faith in Scott at the club but there is very little evidence on the pitch at this level to back that up. I might be wrong but I thought Edwards was signed with him potentially being an option at 10 as well?

Yeah this was 2001: Not necessarily a massive fan of the away but the third is nice. What's more interesting to me is the partnership that's been announced with Uni of Nottingham, they're sponsoring the kits and in return we get to use their facilities for training, among other things...

I think it just looks loads worse with potentially the two starting midfielders out which is affecting people's opinions. Then the other options are unknowns, or Austin who probably isn't good enough as a starter for challenging promotion. I do probably overvalue this, but if we brought in...

Tranmere (A) - as mentioned in the other thread it's squad availability that concerns me here. Draw Shrewsbury (A) EFL Cup - they didn't look great in the FA cup last season (we'd have won if not for three of our trademark defensive howlers) and I don't think they have improved much based on...

Tranmere away, would be a good litmus test for us if I thought we were close to fully fit but seems we might be without Robertson as well as Palmer so not too confident. Would take a draw, definitely. Assuming they're both out, I'd start: Bass Macari Platt Bedeau Nemane Hinchy Edwards Jones...

All Saturdays for Notts too, barring the Grimsby game already announced. With Fleetwood already moved and Wimbledon and MK potentially also moving due to clashes with Forest, that might be 6 home games moved from Saturday 3pm already.

What's the idea behind keeper kits being more expensive? Our home shirts are £47 (bad enough) and GK shirts (exactly the same as Chesterfield's apart from badge and sponsor) are £50.

I don't believe the Roko stuff, we'd be better off waiting Forest out and just taking over theirs. Hopefully the money saved from the outgoings (I assume it's still been cheaper for us to get rid than carry the likes of Rawlo and Randall) will give us options. I reckon we will want 4 more at...