Did he actually say it scared him?
If we win tomorrow, and go on the pitch, Id have the same opinion - and we are a supposed small club. Just for the record.
On the contrary Jase, several people are saying it was fine to go on.
The same people preumably who saw fit to try and rob your captains boots, take his armband, and one wanker allegedly bit him (so he appears to have said - but I havnt heard the interview myself so stand corrected quite easily.
And yet several hundred Villa thought during the match was appropriate. I trust that when we get beat tomorrow we can run on the pitch cos we're in Division 2 against a top division team and got to 3 matches away from winning a cup?
A pitch invasion has its place. During a match is not that place. I would also suggest that a Premier League club winning a quarter final int that place either.
Its all a little pathetic.
I have, and it doesn't. Cant remember the exact figures but the transaction effectively wrote down a debt of £23m down to a debt of about £6.5 after the takeover. Its in the accounts clear as day Im afraid. Don't understand the issue being made originally though. Decent business if you can...
Take a look at the 2011 accounts Walkley - its written is as an "waiver of inter-company debt" I think.
Its got cock all to do with a bit of handbags at Rovrum though :-D