Well they were without Feghouli, Ayew went off and Payet didn't start and isn't fully fit. It's not much surprise that they weren't at the races up front.
Whoa calm down mate. I am just repeating what WHU fans have been sayingIt's one fucking game you dolt. Are you just upset at every side that finished above you last season? Cos that's a lot of teams to have a grudge against.
Well, we're in a new stadium and haven't returned to Upton Park after an away game at Chelsea, so yeah it is a new era.Whoa calm down mate. I am just repeating what WHU fans have been saying![]()
Yes, WHU performance wasn't good, but I didn't see a lot of clear chances for the opposite side as well. They played better, pushed more, kept the ball... sure... but I don't remember any Adrian save. So, if you don't create clear chances to score, you may not win the game, and that was almost happening. Indeed, WHU could come home with 1 point in the rank and no one would've been complaining. Also, do you think it was right to keep the scorer of the winning goal on the pitch after the foul on Adrian? Lucky guy...We were very poor- to be honest it could've been three or four in the end. Payet most definitely should've started; he was fit as he played half of the Juventus game. Nortdveit and Ayew were poor, in fact we were poor all round with only Collins and Carroll having decent games, Chelsea were deserved winners, onwards and upwards for Bournemouth.
Yes, WHU performance wasn't good, but I didn't see a lot of clear chances for the opposite side as well. They played better, pushed more, kept the ball... sure... but I don't remember any Adrian save. So, if you don't create clear chances to score, you may not win the game, and that was almost happening. Indeed, WHU could come home with 1 point in the rank and no one would've been complaining. Also, do you think it was right to keep the scorer of the winning goal on the pitch after the foul on Adrian? Lucky guy...