THE LAST WALTZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2015
- Messages
- 2,050
- Reaction score
- 1,250
- Points
- 113
- Supports
- GILLINGHAM
I hate football
I'm not sure I'm happy about that situation with Northampton but you have to find a way round it I guess.
I can't see any other way around it. My original idea was to keep any postponed selection pending until the re-arranged fixture is played (which wouldn't be too bad in this case as the re-arrangement is only a week and a bit away) but a postponed league match in December might not be re-arranged until March and I could end up with a load of games awaiting fixtures to be played months later. It would be impossible to keep up with where the game was at and I don't get paid enough for that.
The only other potential solution would be to disregard the postponed selection and allow the players affected to pick 2 selections from the next set of fixtures. This would maintain an equal number of selections but I didn't think it would be fair to allow some players to pick from a different set of fixtures to the rest
Nah like I said it's a hard one, just will be annoying if Northampton beat Stourbridge as we predicted but lose at Vale which is a much trickier game!
I think you have got off lightly with it becoming a selection to beat a Vale side in pretty poor form
Seriously though, I see your point but don't really have an answer to the problem that will seem fair to all.