Solihull will have around 1 player then
according to our AGM this weekend, our first team costs are going to be £969k this season, down from approx £1.25m the season before
We believe that this is not exclusively for wages, it also includes travel and other costs associated with the team
Would Barrow have also been under £1m?
Yeah similar discussions going on with our fans; don't see the point of arbitrarily hampering larger clubs who can sustainably spend over the cap, and does nothing to stop the North Ferriby/Fyldes of this world from spending well over what they can naturally affordStill think this should be a proportional percentage of overall turnover.
average wage was £700-750/week, 20-22 players and 42 or 44 week contracts. so taking the bigger figure on each works out at about £726,000 plus bonuses etcWould Barrow have also been under £1m?
I think a lot of Chairman have said SCMP isn't fit for purpose anymore. It did a job to a point but it's far too flimsy, nor is it monitored correctly and has too many loopholes.Still think this should be a proportional percentage of overall turnover.
That was also a point I made one of the another forums, it'll be interesting to see what happens in two or three years because when all the old contracts have expired and gone through the system, we could have a situation where your smaller clubs, I'm going to go to two extremes here but Accrington may only be £700k off Sunderland's budget. It's unlikely they'll do it because they're not that sort of Club, but £700k is a 'small' gamble to get yourselves on an even keel with Sunderland with the £8m TV deal of the Championship on offer, especially if you have absolute trust in your manager at they do with Coleman.Yeah similar discussions going on with our fans; don't see the point of arbitrarily hampering larger clubs who can sustainably spend over the cap, and does nothing to stop the North Ferriby/Fyldes of this world from spending well over what they can naturally afford
Yeah similar discussions going on with our fans; don't see the point of arbitrarily hampering larger clubs who can sustainably spend over the cap, and does nothing to stop the North Ferriby/Fyldes of this world from spending well over what they can naturally afford
Important thing is it'd be guaranteed income, not loans. And it's debts like that which've caused the downfall of clubs like mine and (presumably, since I'm not an expert on Darlo) yours. Didn't MacAnthony have to sponsor Posh in order to put the extra money in he wanted, 'cos of FL turnover rules?The trouble is if you base the cap on turnover, it won't stop little pipsqueak made up clubs spending massively as their wealthy owners inject their cash into the turnover.
He did initially but that loophole got closed years ago I think, and sponsorship's are made sure they're at a market rate now.Important thing is it'd be guaranteed income, not loans. And it's debts like that which've caused the downfall of clubs like mine and (presumably, since I'm not an expert on Darlo) yours. Didn't MacAnthony have to sponsor Posh in order to put the extra money in he wanted, 'cos of FL turnover rules?
W88 | W88 trang chu | KUBET Thailand |
Fun88 | 12Bet | Get top UK casino bonuses for British players in casinos not on GamStop |
---|---|---|
The best ₤1 minimum deposit casinos UK not on GamStop | Find the best new no deposit casino get bonus and play legendary slots | Best UK online casinos list 2022 |
No-Verification.Casino | Casinos that accept PayPal | Top online casinos |
sure.bet | ||
Need help with your academic papers? Customwritings offers high-quality professionals to write essays that deserve an A! |