SUTSS
Survivor Champion 2015
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2015
- Messages
- 3,067
- Reaction score
- 1,027
- Points
- 113
- Supports
- Norwich City
sorry mate.. we were both trying so hard to let the other win too
I was playing against you and Ciderhead
sorry mate.. we were both trying so hard to let the other win too
You'd be in a cup final right now.How would it have looked had we gone by the rules?
Please bring the next set of questions out tonight - want to forget this round ASAPView attachment 846
CUP
Dave 195 - 202 This Charming Mike
Veggie Legs 175 - 164 JoeJoeJoeJoe
Final: This Charming Mike v Veggie Legs
PLATE
JonBCFC 151 - 129 SUTSS
Leewilson 186 -179 Spirederman
Final: JonBCFC V Leewilson
SALTIRE didn't go for Scotland![]()
tbf people had brought up not discussing answers before and it still went on...dont see the problem in keeping the rule. Mike didn't change his answers on the basis of seeing people discussing them...if he had and he'd still changed then fair enough but cant see a problem with Mike getting the points or keeping the rule. Some common sense needed with the rule anyway, surely!?
Prove it!
![]()
Mike would have ignored me and Jimmy if we'd told him what to sayOk...anyone who discussed the answers with Mike come forward
*awaits an influx of piss takers*
Final Round
1) A dessert
2) A starter
3) A pokemon game
4) A synonym for good
5) A synonym for bad
6) A department store
7) A kitchen utensil
8) A rock band
9) A military rank
10) A theme park
Deadline is 4:00pm Tuesday.
Tbf this did happen earlier on this season but people proved completely incapable of doing so.The rule was suggested because people were discussing answers before the deadline. People stopped discussing answers before deadline thus rendering the rule pointless.
Might have made more sense to just ask people not to discuss answers and see how that went before introducing a rule.