The Labour Thread

■■■■■■■■

  • •••••

  • 《《《《♤■

  • ■■■■■■■♤♡◇♧♡♤♤■□●●○○•°`~\|<■□♤♤♤>|\○○●□■《《¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤○○○○○●●●●●●●●●□□□□■■■■■■♤♤■■■■♤♤■♤♤♤■♤■■>>■>

  • Nintendio

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6


Results are only viewable after voting.

The Paranoid Pineapple

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
1,797
Reaction score
1,741
Points
113
Location
Guildford, Surrey
Supports
mighty, mighty Ks
Some more great gains the other night lads
unsure.gif


https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/911000370696085504
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/910993283962286086
 

Benji

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
2,357
Reaction score
1,054
Points
113
Supports
Expected Goals
As long as the Tories are still losing, it's good news to me.
 

Jockney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
2,969
Reaction score
1,552
Points
113
Supports
Fred Onyedinma
Lib dem voters in Chesterfield aren't otherwise going to be voting labour, lez be real.
 

Aber gas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
5,497
Reaction score
3,989
Points
113
Location
Abergavenny
Supports
Bristol rovers
A minority of Anarchists and Libertarian Communists who I otherwise have a lot of respect for, not offering productive critique, implicitly lumping lots of top socialists in with the SWP because the latter have a presence/managed to sneak in.
Continuation of the Novara beef maybe?
 

Ian_Wrexham

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
567
Reaction score
736
Points
93
Supports
Comrade Lineker's Revolutionary Junta
Some peak ultra-leftism going on at notable social media accounts re. Labour Party Conference and The World Transformed. I don't see the point in critique for critique's sake in the current moment. A lot of these people aren't even bothering to posit direct action (accompanying divestment from representational politics) anymore, which I thought was one of intended statements; it's just ultra-left cynicism.

I'm very cynical because a) the labour party has demonstrated my cynicism was correct with the last three months of rowing back on most of their more interesting promises b) because Weyman Bennett and SUTR are attending events alongside senior Labour Party figures and c) because internal party democracy is boring as fuck for anyone not invested in the party form.
 

Ian_Wrexham

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
567
Reaction score
736
Points
93
Supports
Comrade Lineker's Revolutionary Junta
Have you noticed too, that Momentum - who, previously were an insurgent organisation at odds with the majority of the party grandees - has shifted into A Respectable Wing Of The Party?

Instead of using their and Corbyn's new found respectability to push the party further left, Momentum's leaders (both organisationally and ideologically) seem more focused on entrenching their own place within the party structure.

There were crickets when Dawn Butler announced that Labour would deliver a real terms public sector wage cut. When Amber Rudd, in contempt of court, deported an Afghan asylum seeker and then had to return him, both the leadership and those on the left of the party who should have been holding them to account - were silent (their silence on issues of migrant justice more generally are equally contemptible). When Corbyn supported Sarah Champion's awful article on abuse and race, there was very little censure for The Absolute Boy from anyone in positions of influence on the left. And that they continue to have any truck at all with people like Paul Mason is beyond me. Corbyn's personal chumminess with various violent misogynists ought to be cause for concern too.

You can see the change in the way senior Momentum figures tweet now. When previously, they were attacked for being out-of-touch metropolitan elites, they seem to be throwing those accusations at the people on their left - and gearing their organisation for "normal people" who like pubs and football - rather than addressing concerns of those they deem "ultralefts", "identarians" or "playing purity politics".

I get that people's views and opinions change over time, but the only difference between now and 2014 - when many of these people were offering strident critiques of electoralism - seems to be which side of the fence they're now on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: .V.

Abertawe

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
4,168
Reaction score
1,420
Points
113
Supports
Swansea
You want Labour to return to libby shitness thus alienate the majority of the population. It wouldn't work.
 

Ian_Wrexham

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
567
Reaction score
736
Points
93
Supports
Comrade Lineker's Revolutionary Junta
You want Labour to return to libby shitness thus alienate the majority of the population. It wouldn't work.

No I don't. I want Labour/Momentum to promote an actually radical agenda, rather than have "radicals" leading them.
 

Aber gas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
5,497
Reaction score
3,989
Points
113
Location
Abergavenny
Supports
Bristol rovers
Tremendous stuff from Big John at conference this afternoon. Making our commitment to renationalised utilities clear and also getting rid of the disastrous pfi contracts. Also committed to providing a state investment bank with the aim of funding fourth generation industry.
It's a tremendous speech, I'll try and put it up a little later.
 

Jockney

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
2,969
Reaction score
1,552
Points
113
Supports
Fred Onyedinma
Despite the caveat, you're still criticising people for not being as radical as you'd like them to be. On the one hand I think that is fair enough given the potential of the project and the very real ramifications on how the left will engage in politics in this country, but on the other hand completely elides what is actually happening in organisations like Momentum and across branches and CLPs up and the down the UK. Ignoring the unreconstructed Bennites, many of whom seem more keen on revenge than anything else, the new left within the party only really has absolute consensus on two things: 1) Jeremy needs to remain leader until 2) the left is organised and the party has been democratised enough to build a long-term socialist project within the Labour Party. Like, everything is contingent on that (perhaps to a fault), but that doesn't mean there isn't heterogeneity and dissent; several left CLP secretaries, and several more who hold positions in Momentum branches (that I know of), came out in opposition to Corbyn's stance on freedom of movement; then there are of course quite a few notable ex-SWP who have joined the Labour Party and are not happy with Corbyn's lack of discrimination when it comes to associating with fairly well-known rape apologists and people like Steve Hedley. But then the outcome of these criticisms should be, and usually is, increased engagement, rather than jacking the whole thing in. So much of socialist politics in my lifetime has been about the need to keep your hands clean; retreating further and further into groups until the organisation you're in calcifies and you forget that there's supposed to be a telos, a horizon; that resistance by itself isn't enough. I don't expect anarchists, or people skeptical of the Labour reform project more generally, to jump into bed with the party, or put faith in electoral politics: far from it, I think a diversity of tactics and positions can only be a good thing for the prospect of socialism in this country. I do think though, that tearing into a movement of (mainly young) people, and worse articulating those attacks in pious and moralistic language, ultimately betrays an absence of a politics. It isn't 'wrong' on any factual or ethical level, but it has almost negative utility.
 
Last edited:

Ian_Wrexham

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
567
Reaction score
736
Points
93
Supports
Comrade Lineker's Revolutionary Junta
Despite the caveat, you're still criticising people for not being as radical as you'd like them to be. On the one hand I think that is fair enough given the potential of the project and the very real ramifications on how the left will engage in politics in this country, but on the other hand completely elides what is actually happening in organisations like Momentum and across branches and CLPs up and the down the UK. Ignoring the unreconstructed Bennites, many of whom seem more keen on revenge than anything else, the new left within the party only really has absolute consensus on two things: 1) Jeremy needs to remain leader until 2) the left is organised and the party has been democratised enough to build a long-term socialist project within the Labour Party. Like, everything is contingent on that (perhaps to a fault), but that doesn't mean there isn't heterogeneity and dissent; several left CLP secretaries, and several more who hold positions in Momentum branches (that I know of), came out in opposition to Corbyn's stance on freedom of movement; then there are of course quite a few notable ex-SWP who have joined the Labour Party and are not happy with Corbyn's lack of discrimination when it comes to associating with fairly well-known rape apologists and people like Steve Hedley. But then the outcome of these criticisms should be, and usually is, increased engagement, rather than jacking the whole thing in. So much of socialist politics in my lifetime has been about the need to keep your hands clean; retreating further and further into groups until the organisation you're in calcifies and you forget that there's supposed to be a telos, a horizon; that resistance by itself isn't enough. I don't expect anarchists, or people skeptical of the Labour reform project more generally, to jump into bed with the party, or put faith in electoral politics: far from it, I think a diversity of tactics and positions can only be a good thing for the prospect of socialism in this country. I do think though, that tearing into a movement of (mainly young) people, and worse articulating those attacks in pious and moralistic language, ultimately betrays an absence of a politics. It isn't 'wrong' on any factual or ethical level, but it has almost negative utility.

On stuff like immigration, there's a real need for a group with clout and resources to support the multiple, autonomous, migrant justice struggles - be it against restricting access to housing and healthcare, or the scandal of detention and charter-flight deportation. I'm fine with any group making those criticisms being reformist - but it's cowardly to stay out of the debate altogether.

But by and large, Momentum doesn't want to touch these issues, much less actively seek to shift the position of the leadership on it. You can argue the same thing on other areas of policy that Labour have been poor on - e.g. removing the benefits cap, or increasing public sector pay.

Obviously what Momentum is doing is trying (with some success) to take over the bureaucracy of the party. In order to do that, they think they need to avoid conflict between the Mason-wing and the pro-free-movement tendency. But avoiding conflict allows contradictions that are inherent to any sufficiently large group to entrench and ferment - it also allows people who's main goal is enhancing their own status to worm their way into positions of control and dominance. A culture of avoiding conflict and of "unity" (of a top-down disciplinary sort) is a deeply unhealthy one.

I'm glad young people are getting engaged in politics. I worry that a world of bureaucratic-socialist passive-aggression will leave them burnt out and never wanting to engage with political activism ever again. If commies want to critically engage with labour, well it's their funeral. I don't think it's purity politics to say dealing with the sectarian left is Not For Me.

But the former radicals who are now tweeting in support of more cops, more border guards or whatever deserve nothing but contempt.
 
Last edited:

Ebeneezer Goode

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
3,657
Reaction score
1,541
Points
113
Supports
England
Please, have a go at explaining the historical development of the nation-state. We can wait.

I think quite a lot of things are going to turn out to be "violence" if this is the rationale you're going to use.
 

Ian_Wrexham

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
567
Reaction score
736
Points
93
Supports
Comrade Lineker's Revolutionary Junta
I think quite a lot of things are going to turn out to be "violence" if this is the rationale you're going to use.

Given you have kittens whenever fascists scuffle with anti-fascists it's weird you deny that the many thousands of deaths each year in Europe that could have been prevented through free movement don't constitute "violence".
 

Ebeneezer Goode

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
3,657
Reaction score
1,541
Points
113
Supports
England
Given you have kittens whenever fascists scuffle with anti-fascists it's weird you deny that the many thousands of deaths each year in Europe that could have been prevented through free movement don't constitute "violence".

Because words have meaning.
 

Abertawe

Site Supporter
Site Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2015
Messages
4,168
Reaction score
1,420
Points
113
Supports
Swansea
Given you have kittens whenever fascists scuffle with anti-fascists it's weird you deny that the many thousands of deaths each year in Europe that could have been prevented through free movement don't constitute "violence".
Right, are you saying complete open border into the UK from anywhere?
 

Ian_Wrexham

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
567
Reaction score
736
Points
93
Supports
Comrade Lineker's Revolutionary Junta
Right, are you saying complete open border into the UK from anywhere?

I don't think abolishing the UK border would do an awful lot of good. Borders are like dams - you build up pressure you need to remove before you remove the dam. Unlike some people, I view it as practical and necessary though - not "a political horizon" - which in my mind is a massive cop out.

My steps towards open border are as follows:
1) stop policing internal borders - amnesty for everyone already here
2) open up safe passage into Europe from the middle east and north africa
3) organise (voluntary) dispersal of new migrants on arrival around Europe.

This would happen in conjunction with a dramatic shift in foreign policy away from imperialist positions and towards reparations and restitution for colonial atrocities.
 

AFCB_Mark

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2014
Messages
3,514
Reaction score
1,063
Points
113
Supports
A single unitary authority for urban Dorset
The Party immediately retreating from McDonnell's PFI plan I noticed, clarifying that only a “handful” of the PFI deals would actually be taken over, once the sheer sums involved were worked out by the press. As opposed to the bluster of “We will bring existing PFI contracts back in-house. We’re bringing them back! We’re bringing them back!”. Which sounded rather Nigel Farage-esq :lol:

The more sensible line to take would have been: 'we won't sign any more PFI contracts in future, leaving the existing deals (mostly initiated by old New Labour it should be noted) to run their course, and admitting that we'll need to raise new facility funding for the NHS from tax instead'. But that isn't nearly as excitable I guess.
 

Aber gas

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2015
Messages
5,497
Reaction score
3,989
Points
113
Location
Abergavenny
Supports
Bristol rovers
Not sure what's controversial about nationalising PFI contracts. It seems very sensible to let the ones with limited time run out. Take back the ones with break clauses and seize the others. Another fiscally responsible ( and popular) policy. Excellent stuff.
Good stuff on rent controls today too. For too long have rent seeking leeches made people financially insecure and miserable. There is finally hope for millions.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
16,566
Messages
1,224,954
Members
8,510
Latest member
miko_brb

SITE SPONSORS

W88 W88 trang chu KUBET Thailand
Fun88 12Bet Get top UK casino bonuses for British players in casinos not on GamStop
The best ₤1 minimum deposit casinos UK not on GamStop Find the best new no deposit casino get bonus and play legendary slots Best UK online casinos list 2022
No-Verification.Casino Casinos that accept PayPal Top online casinos
sure.bet miglioriadm.net: siti scommesse non aams
Need help with your academic papers? Customwritings offers high-quality professionals to write essays that deserve an A!
Top