Marcus Rashford

[AtaturkOzgutson]

Not aimed at anyone in particular, just the way the debate has gone.

 

[sl1k]

Having said that (after looking at the squad) , taking Rashford for Walcott wouldn't be such a bad idea.

This is along the lines of what I was thinking. Walcott is a dud yet to realise his 'potential' or even know his best position a decade into his career.

Rashford can play out wide and is hot right now. Should he continue this form adding a few more to his tally, what we got to lose.

 

[Ebeneezer Goode]

Rashford has never been tested even close to international standard though. The Premier League is tactically and technically miles away from what he'd experience against a top international side. If this was the March friendlies then fair enough, but this is crunch time now and we'd be throwing an untested player into the mix for no real reason. A year ago people would have wanted the same for Grealish, now look at him.

 

[JaseTheVillain]

Rashford has never been tested even close to international standard though. The Premier League is tactically and technically miles away from what he'd experience against a top international side. If this was the March friendlies then fair enough, but this is crunch time now and we'd be throwing an untested player into the mix for no real reason. A year ago people would have wanted the same for Grealish, now look at him.

A spoilt brat who let the fame get to him... Been learning from our club captain, clearly.

 

[johnnytodd]

Lets be honest it doesn't matter who goes we'll still get raped .

 

[Jarv]

As much as i like Rashford and how he's done he shouldn't go yet. let him develop longer first. Don't want to put too much pressure on him too soon.

 

[JoshBCFC]

Rashford has never been tested even close to international standard though. The Premier League is tactically and technically miles away from what he'd experience against a top international side. If this was the March friendlies then fair enough, but this is crunch time now and we'd be throwing an untested player into the mix for no real reason. A year ago people would have wanted the same for Grealish, now look at him.

Yeah but what have England got to lose? At this rate we're already going to have tons of strikers so one of them could just replace Rashford if he plays poorly.

 

[Ebeneezer Goode]

Yeah but what have England got to lose?

Football matches?